You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

#### RE: Jaguar.Force: History of a FRAUD!

in #fraudlast year (edited)

Ok, you gonna make me give it to you the special class.
It's not about they gave us 400 STEEM it's about Steem Power.
Let's see if you understand that:
-They delegate us 400 SP.
-We daily upvote them with 6000 SP (that's x15).
-They go from earning 0.01\$ daily to earn 0.15\$ daily.
-Since we offer that daily we can say that monthly and annually it's the same for the supposed 400 SP amount:
-Monthly - they would have earnt 0.30\$ but we give them 4.50\$.
-Annually - they would have earnt 3.65\$ but we give them 54.75\$.

A perfect 1500% ROI, my man.
I hope you finally understand that we're not misleading anything. On the contrary, we are actually giving more than a 1500% ROI to some members.

For being more clear, when you multiply x1 the benefits in percentage is represented as 100% return.
X5 - 500% return

And that is. You don't need to multiply per 1500 because 1500% is a representation of x15 in return.

1% ROI it's about x 0.01

Sort:
last year (edited)

Lmao

If they self vote 10x a day they would earn \$0.10 a day plus their own curation.

You voting them takes a curator’s cut.

Hint: daily ROI = compounding. Bet Bitconnect taught you nothing why 1% daily is unsustainable.

Don’t use words you don’t understand. Stick to your mother tongue.

You 15x’d their income (even that’s not true, more like 50% more if you give curation back) Not their return. The return is compared against the 400 Steem.

That way you say they would spend 20% VP in 10 votes, thing we save them. Moreover, 10 times upvoting yourself doesn't give you 0.01\$ since as far you spend VP the reward lowers and finally goes to 0 soon (in the case of 400SP).
Ok, so ROI means the Return Of Investment and one of its formula is Return(Net)/Investment x 100. That way our ROI would be 84%= 54,35\$/64\$ (400 STEEM) × 100. Not bad either.
Ok so you have the reason about the ROI.
Well, we just wanted to mean 1500% return but that was before the HF21/22, true, because now curator keep more than 50% and the rewards are lower.
Anyways I'm sure we're actually giving a 750% return or 40% ROI to some of our members wich thing is still not bad, don't you think?
Thanks anyways for clearing the misunderstanding.
I owe you an apology.

No problem.

I apologise for being crass, but the wording would have thrown many people off.

At best, people would think you don’t know what you are on about. At worst, outsiders will think you are scammers.

Take care.

I will publish a communicate talking about our misunderstanding with ROI and return and going to change it righ now in the profile text.
Thanks again.

now it says 600% net ?, more bullshit

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.03
JST 0.028
TRX 0.03
STEEM 0.20
JST 0.028
SBD 3.26