You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Rejecting HF21 in its current state

in #steem2 years ago

While reading your post, I got an idea how to fight bid bot abuse: add a small "fee" for delegations, devalue delegations a bit, while creating an incentive for manual curation:


I'll tell you a secret. I deserve a tiny bit of the blame for the SP delegation feature. Back in 2016, a few of us started Project Curie. There were whales who would support by trailing our votes. Since there was no delegation feature, we worked out a deal where a script would track how much rewards Curie's votes were generating for their account, and they'll donate some or all of it. The SP delegation feature was designed as a response to make this easier. (It also had other drivers, such as making account creation with delegation possible, of course.)

Anyway, while I agree with your idea, ultimately that's simply what will happen if there was a delegation fee - people will go back to how it was before the feature existed. They would just follow the voting trail normally, and have a script do the calculations for the rewards generated etc.

very interesting and thx for the feedback, simulating delegation with a script and sharing rewards sounds interesting but also a bit complicated and perhaps would stop some users from using bid bots and just curate themselves. Because Steemit is a very complex and dynamic system, I think we should try out some promising proposals, test them for a predefined time (for example a week or one month), and if the results are good, keep the change or otherwise roll back the change.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.99
TRX 0.13
JST 0.121
BTC 55783.78
ETH 3965.99
BNB 654.61
SBD 6.56