I set my voting proxy on @proxy.token

in #steemitlast year (edited)
  1. I didn’t support the 0.22.2 soft fork, and will NEVER support these kind of actions that try to freeze assets purchased from someone in a legitimate way. DPoS should NOT give a poor example of freezing investor’s legitimately purchased funds for any purposes whatsoever. Also, the 0.22.2 agreement was made among “certain” members of Steem, it was not the consensus of the community

  2. I don't care f***ing narrative of Ninja Mining. Do you really thinkg that the new users who joined the Steem community via powering up SP at an avg. cost of $3 - $4 care about the historical event?

  3. I won't support the witnesses who proceeded 0.22.2 and now running 0.22.4444 which is literally the same as 0.22.5. It's super ridiculous. This drama is causing huge uncertainty on Steem blockchain and negative effect on the hope with new Steem supported from Tron ecosystem. We're too busy to make good products, not a drama.

  4. Some people send FUD that @justinsunsteemit bought Steemit inc. to dump his token later on. So what? Aren't we living in a free market system, not communism world? I wouldn't invest my personal money (it was just $40K-$50K, super tinier than his) if this platform was trying to restrict the ROI-seeking attempt.

  5. Steem platform should be a place for a variety of users, entrepreneurs, investors, and companies who can seek their “selfish” interest (money, fame, whatever) but still lead their various intentions to result in good positive surplus, rather than just becoming a small-sized English Subreddit.

  6. As an entrepreneur who has devoted wholly my two years on making Steemhunt and Reviewhunt, my biggest matter is to make this Steem as a "proper" platform, not a small English subreddit. In the past year, the Steem ecosystem has become quite hostile to new users. The massive downvoting pool attacking non-English-based communities killed so many existing/new users. Also, waiting for the SMT launch has left many users feeling fed up and because of this many great DApps have left or gone into maintenance mode. Steem ecosystem needs big changes. The big changes that can bring more diversity and opportunities.

  7. Steemit inc. needs more money to hire the top level of UX designer. I designed Steemhunt and Reviewhunt, and myself is considered to be a low-level designer. And honestly? Everything that Steemit.com and Steem.com are designed is f***ing ridiculous in my point of view. I strongly believe and admire the old Steemit inc. dev team. They've made Communities, MIRA, SMT, ... all from the small resources. But design?? hm... Steemit inc. really needs to hire top-level designers.

  8. We need a new witness voting system. There are too many "seized" and "forgotten" witness votes that make witnesses not to much compete with each other. These are my rough thoughts: 1. All the witness votes the user makes should reset every new quarter (meaning that all users must renew their witness votes on a quarterly basis). 2. A Town Hall Meeting with the top 50 witnesses should be set by Steemit inc. so they can pitch their quarterly work/achievement. 3. The Witness voting reward pool should be set to reward the users who have renewed their witness votes. 4. Reduce the number of one person to vote from 30 to 3.

====

I just updated all my witness votes to 0.22.5. Reason? The previous top 20 witnesses have already about 4 years period to do something for Steem. Even in a normal world, we run re-election and change the gov if the result was not pleasing, right? Again, as an individual who powered up all my SP at the avg $3-$4 years ago and run DApps on Steem by waiting for SMT for years too, it's too obvious to support the new stream.

====

I'm too busy for running dapps and business, not the politics. I set my witness voting proxy on @proxy.token.

Sort:  

I didn’t support the 0.22.2 soft fork, and will NEVER support these kind of actions that try to freeze assets purchased from someone in a legitimate way. DPoS should NOT give a poor example of freezing investor’s legitimately purchased funds for any purposes whatsoever. Also, the 0.22.2 agreement was made among “certain” members of Steem, it was not the consensus of the community

It wasnt legitimate. It was a purchase of known stolen goods. They purchased a company, they should have known one of their largest asset was stolen goods. That's called due diligence. Good luck trying to explain to a judge/jury how you didn't know the Mona Lisa you purchased was stolen.

Some people send FUD that @justinsunsteemit bought Steemit inc. to dump his token later on. So what? Aren't we living in a free market system, not communism world? I wouldn't invest my personal money (it was just $40K-$50K, super tinier than his) if this platform was trying to restrict the ROI-seeking attempt.

It's not FUD, he literally said so, there's literally a recording of it.

We need a new witness voting system. There are too many "seized" and "forgotten" witness votes that make witnesses not to much compete with each other. These are my rough thoughts: 1. All the witness votes the user makes should reset every new quarter (meaning that all users must renew their witness votes on a quarterly basis). 2. A Town Hall Meeting with the top 50 witnesses should be set by Steemit inc. so they can pitch their quarterly work/achievement. 3. The Witness voting reward pool should be set to reward the users who have renewed their witness votes. 4. Reduce the number of one person to vote from 30 to 3.

I agree that we should review the witness process so that the same stake cant elect 100% of the top 20 witnesses. 10 votes is probably enough.

PS: I was also against 0.2244 but I am even more against what @justinsunsteemit did with Binance, Poloniex and other exchanges. The users of those exchanges, cant cash out their money now if they want to.

Thanks for sharing your opinion even though we have a different opinion.

Justin wasn't going to dump steem. That's just his english getting in the way.
He's an investor, and he'd want to make sure his investment was profitable. Wouldn't you sell some of your stake to do other stuff for yourself?

According to the Bible, God is everywhere: Fact or Fiction.

Watch the Video below to know the Answer...

(Sorry for sending this comment. We are not looking for our self profit, our intentions is to preach the words of God in any means possible.)


Comment what you understand of our Youtube Video to receive our full votes. We have 30,000 #SteemPower. It's our little way to Thank you, our beloved friend.
Check our Discord Chat
Join our Official Community: https://steemit.com/created/hive-182074

I do not support you - because if you think so, you should have talked about this a month ago, a week ago, yesterday but not now. This is like a betrayal.

  1. All the witness votes the user makes should reset every new quarter (meaning that all users must renew their witness votes on a quarterly basis)

I liked this - excellent - (I will supplement) the full quarterly report of each witness on the work done. With voting statistics and plans for the next quarter.
The witness is a position and we are shareholders and have the right to receive comprehensive information on the activities of each witness.

...An what about the community?
It seems that you’re only thinking about ROI, maybe looking for a fast one.
I personally don’t see any coherence on your speech nor anything profitable for us the community , the content creators, maybe that would make you look down while you’re set to look high, very high as higher as you can on the list.... good luck!
By the way, that list looked so matching the way your beloved Justin tends to state things....

UNDELEGATED. Running 22.5 is one thing. But your assessment of the situation re: Justin Sun and the Steemit ninja-mined stake is embarrassing on multiple levels.

undelegate_steemhunt.JPG