# Poor Misunderstood Exponential Curve. It Gets Better

**Source:**Pixabay

Let’s start this post with a famous story. Sessa, an Indian minister, invented the game of chess and presented his king with a beautiful wooden chessboard. Fascinated with his new toy, and feeling in a generous mood, the king asked Sessa to name any payment for the marvellous gift. Sessa replied that all he desired was an amount of rice that would double for every one of the 64 squares on the chessboard. A single grain was placed on the first square, followed by two on the second and four on the third. Observing the first few payments, the king was amazed that Sessa would ask for such a puny reward.

The story doesn’t end well for the kingdom, with the total amount of rice coming to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 grains of rice, weighing about 1,199,000,000,000 tons[^{1}]- far more than the total amount of rice in the world even today. Depending on the version of the story, it also doesn’t end well for Sessa, who is unsurprisingly executed for making the King look bad.

The grains of rice doubling every square is an example of exponential growth. The 3 to 8% compound interest rates we often find in investments are also examples of exponential growth, though at a much lower growth rate than the chessboard example. Go here for a full explanation of exponential growth.

The blue line in the diagram below is an example of exponential growth, while the green line is simple linear growth. As we can see, the exponential line stays well below the linear line for the majority of the time covered by the graph, before streaking up far past it at the end.

**Source:**Own Work

Linear growth increases by a fixed amount each time period. If you added one dollar to your piggy bank every week without fail, and your sister never discovered and ransacked it, your savings would grow at a linear rate.

Today we are far more familiar with exponential growth rates. Many people think they understand them quite well, and wouldn’t make a foolish mistake like the King in the story. There is a lot of evidence that this belief is simply not true. We will look at that evidence a little further on, but before we do, let’s look at why exponential growth rates together with our failure to understand them well is very relevant to the block chain world today.

## Characteristics of Digital Assets

Singularity Hub recently revived this[^{2}] article from November 2016 due to its relevance to what is happening today. The article talks about the exponential growth rates of digital assets (such as cryptocurrencies) and their ability to show explosive growth after a deceptively quiet start. The characteristics of exponentially growing digital assets is summarized in the ‘Six D’s’ articulated by Peter Diamandes

I will quickly summarise them, but it’s worthwhile checking out the full version here

- Digitized: anything that can be digitised (e.g. photographs) can grow exponentially
- Deceptive: exponential growth is deceptive because it seems to grow very slowly at first
- Disruptive: digital technologies outperform ‘solid’ products due to greater effectiveness and cost. e.g. downloading MP3 files versus buying CDs.
- Demonetised: copying digital assets is so cheap the products often become free
- Dematerialised: physical objects such as maps or dictionaries are now apps on our phone.
- Democratised: the Internet gives huge numbers of people access to digital technologies

For the remainder of the article I want to concentrate on the second characteristic of exponentially growing digital assets: they are deceptive.

Here is the same graph as above, this time including some of my scribbles on it to reproduce the graph given here

**Source: Own Work**

The disappointment area describes the area where exponential growth ( the blue line) seems to lag far behind simple linear growth( the green line). We can imagine a more careful version of Sessa who asked to be paid 1000 grains of rice every week for 64 weeks. After three weeks careful Sessa would have 3000 grains of rice and could make it rain all over exponential Sessa’s seven grains

**Source:**Pixabay

On the right-hand side of the graph people are usually filled with shock and amazement as growth takes off.

Obviously no crypto currency is following a simple exponential growth rate. The point I want to make is it’s very normal for people to be disappointed with early growth of a promising digital asset. If and when a cryptocurrency gains true mainstream acceptance growth is very likely to be explosive (due to the characteristics expressed in the 6 D's above) - much faster than the majority of people would expect.

I think the blockchain community sometimes is guilty of a little too much cheerleading. So to temper my predictions of explosive growth with a little negativity, I don’t think most of the cryptocurrencies today will survive to benefit from the latter stages of exponential growth. A few will take-off. I think Steem has a good chance to be one of those, mostly due to the successful use cases it has shown.

## What is the evidence that people really do misunderstand exponential growth?

Failure to understand exponential growth is so widespread it is a recognised bias in psychology, going by the name of, as you might expect, Exponential Growth Bias. This bias takes the form of expecting exponential growth to take more of a linear form. People underestimate the gains from exponential growth in the medium to long-term[^{3}].

In Levy and Tasoff (2016)[^{4}] subjects had to answer a series of questions involving exponential growth. After answering the questions, subjects were surveyed on how confident they were that their answers were correct. Subjects overall did very badly at answering the questions correctly- as predicted in exponential growth bias they underestimated how fast exponential values can increase. In addition the subjects showed a high degree of overconfidence that they could answer the questions correctly. One striking finding was that the group of subjects with the least correct answers were among the ones with the highest degree of confidence in the accuracy of their answers.

**Source:**Creative Commons

This last finding was consistent with the finding in Kruger and Dunning (1999)[

^{5}] that the least skilled people were the most likely to hugely overestimate their ability. The researchers explained this finding with the increased 'metacognitive skill’ that comes with increased knowledge. Once people gain a certain amount of knowledge in an area they are able to recognise what good and bad performance is, and become aware of the deficits in their own performance. The least knowledgeable are unaware of what good performance even looks like, making them unable to assess the performance of themselves or others. They fall back on the illusionary superiority bias, believing that they are a bit better than average.[

^{6}]

Exponential growth bias combined with the hugely inflated estimations of their own ability by the least knowledgeable has a lot of consequences in the financial world. People routinely make large mistakes in financial planning, underestimating future values of a compounding asset [^{3}]. In addition, the people most likely to make the worst mistakes are also the least likely to seek help in investment decisions.[^{4}]

## Why are people so prone to exponential growth bias?

For most of human existence, the world that we have been aware of has been almost strictly linear. There has always been some bacteria around us growing at an exponential rate, but only recently have we become aware of them. Thinking in terms of exponential growth doesn't come naturally to us

## Conclusion

What does this all mean for digital assets today with a currently low value but large potential? Due to exponential growth bias there is a good chance that this type of asset is undervalued. People are disappointed by relatively small initial returns and underestimate the speed and size of returns that are possible in later cycles of compounding.

REFERENCES

mathowl (64)3 years ago (edited)Well in a sense exponential growth is derived from assuming a linear (relation on the) rate of change. For example, consider the ODE dx/dt=x , the right-hand side is linear and its solution is given by x(t)= x(0)e

^{t}. :)flyyingkiwi (55)3 years agoI was conscious when writing this that my own understanding of the math is not great. So the exponential curve I used here is a linear function because the rate of change is constant?

mathowl (64)3 years ago (edited)The rate of change of an exponential is not constant. But there is a linear relation between its derivative (=rate of change) and the actual function. Or more explicitely d(e

^{t})/dt=e^{t}, so when you take the derivative you get the same function back. Just like when you take the function y=x insert a number for x then the output, y, is equal to x. But in the case of the exponent the function in the previous example gets swapped with the derivative.flyyingkiwi (55)3 years agoI think I should make it a project of mine to develop a good understanding of the basics of calculus. I have read a little bit about the history of its development, stretches over a really long period of human history. I have done a lot of statistics, but very weak in other areas. Thanks very much for the great explanation

agmoore (64)3 years agoA good balance between realism and optimism. Not sure how much more I know about the future of cryptocurrencies after reading your blog. However, I do have a better understanding of exponential vs linear growth expectations.

As for the future of Steem--I'm here to stay. I'm betting it's a winner.

flyyingkiwi (55)3 years ago (edited)I am also here to stay on steemit. Some really great communities on here, I don't think they're going anywhere. By the way, as a good writer (and also I think you said you have a background in humanities?) you should check out some of the writing competitions run by @f3nix. This is the latest one, going on now. Best community I have found on here, along with steemstem. We are getting a discord server soon!

agmoore (64)3 years agoI will check that out, thank you. And thanks for describing me as a "good writer". I work really hard--no natural "talent" there.

snowyknight (57)3 years agoThe Sessa story that started your post made my day! I did not know that.... checkmate! Great post... let's see where this goes!

flyyingkiwi (55)3 years agoIt's definitely a lot of rice. Steemit and the blockchain world generally are a fun ride ( as long as you don't have to a high percentage of your networth invested). Who knows what's going to happen!

snowyknight (57)3 years agoAgreed. Let's see where this goes. I think the adoption by the developing world is a key indication of the future value and utility. Perhaps some parts of the world it is still fringe. But, the value of blockchain is amazing. It is going to take careful work to guide where this goes however... Thanks again!

teamnz (50)3 years ago## You just got a Team NZ upvote!

This is a curation bot for TeamNZ. Please join our AUS/NZ community on Discord.For any inquiries/issues about the bot please contact @cryptonik.

eurogee (65)3 years agoThanks to you @flyyingkiwi for calming frayed nerves via this richly informative post! I so much believe in Cryptos vis a vis blockchain technology but the event of last few months are quite enough to shakes people's faith and trust. But having read this post, I am back with my fanaticism about cryptos

@eurogee of @euronation and @steemstem communities

flyyingkiwi (55)3 years agoI think now is really a great time to buy into promising block chain projects. I don’t know enough to identify which ones those are, but I did recently buy more steem. I am a believer!

utopian-io (71)3 years ago## Hi @flyyingkiwi!

Your post was upvoted by utopian.io in cooperation with steemstem - supporting knowledge, innovation and technological advancement on the Steem Blockchain.

## Contribute to Open Source with utopian.io

Learn how to contribute on our website and join the new open source economy.

Want to chat? Join the Utopian Community on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrVnonzerosum (61)3 years agoExponential growth is a concept that we often have to communicate in infectious disease control. For me its the concept that makes measles so terrifying. Each disease (under various circumstances) has its own reproduction number, otherwise know as R

^{0}(pronounced R-Nought). This is the number of people on average each infected person will go on to infect. If the number is bigger that 1 the outbreak continues of it is smaller than 1 the outbreak will start to draw to the end.The Ebola outbreak in 2014/15 had and R

^{0}of 2, this made it similar to the grains of rice on the chess board. Measles on the other hand has an R0 of between 14-18! Measles kills around 1 out of ever couple of children it infects and causes a great deal of suffering for those it doesnt. This is why we care so much about having a measles vaccination rate of 95% if we didn’t it would spread like wild fire.Here’s hoping the Steemit (a good disease that I’m happy I caught) has a high R

^{0}!flyyingkiwi (55)3 years agoI was just thinking it's lucky that the common cold is rarely fatal, since it must have a similar R0 to measles. But then I guess there must have been super virulent strains that killed off entire populations, with that strain also going extinct due to lack of hosts!

nonzerosum (61)3 years agoIt's actually pretty low (in comparision) at only a 2-4 from what I've heard in the past. There's just nothing stopping it. Not a cold but that spanish flu (1918) was a bit of a shitter. It's best not to think about this in the context of weaponized smallpox (not that you we're, sorry for bringing it up).

flyyingkiwi (55)3 years agoThat gives me an idea just how fast measles can spread. Weaponized diseases are definitely super scary. I guess the main reason no one uses them is because the bugs don’t know they’re only supposed to attack people from the other country

agmoore (64)3 years ago:)))